How will you measure change and impact?

Select an evaluation strategy

Select an evaluation strategy

Selecting an appropriate evaluation strategy is essential for generating credible and reliable evidence to answer questions about a programme’s performance and impact. This evidence can be used to improve the current programme, develop plans for scale-up, and inform the design of future programmes. An evaluation strategy should be identified early in the programme design phase to ensure sufficient budget, time and resources are allocated to fulfil the scope and complexity of the evaluation. VAWG programmes often involve non-linear and complex change. Evaluating programmes of this nature requires innovative approaches and tools that capture contribution as well as attribution and unexpected impacts. Evaluations of VAWG programming should also recognise that in contexts of resistance and the roll-back of rights, holding the line on women’s rights can be a success in itself.

Guiding Principles
  • Survivor-Centred Approach
  • Do no harm approach
  • Leave No One Behind, Equity and Non-Discrimination
Spotlight Initiative

Approach and Learning

All Spotlight Initiative programmes were expected to conduct mid-term evaluations as well as final evaluations. In addition a number of global level and thematic assessments were conducted to identify learning and impact. Key approaches and learning included: 

Conducting mid-term assessments to promote lesson learning within programmes. Programmes were expected to conduct Mid-Term Assessments while a programme was ongoing. This was to support programmes to identify opportunities for improvement, consider lessons learned, and develop recommendations to inform the development of the next phase of programming. A variety of data collection methods was used, including key informant interviews, focus group discussions, document reviews, and online surveys.

Conducted evaluations at the global level to promote learning for future programming. For example, Spotlight Initiative engaged in a global level final evaluation to assess the impact of Spotlight Initiative overall. The main objective of the final evaluation is to assess the Initiative’s overall performance, inclusive of its design (notably its commitment to UN Reform and the principle of Leaving No One Behind), its management and operations (the extent to which it is “fit for purpose”) and the results it has achieved (vis a vis its global results framework and other measures of success). The evaluation is based on document review, eight country case studies, five regional case studies and five non-Spotlight Initiative/counterfactual country case studies, key informant interviews and targeted questionnaires.

Commissioning thematic assessments to learn about progress on cross-cutting commitments: Spotlight Initiative also commissioned a global thematic assessment focusing on three key themes: (1) the meaningful engagement of civil society; (2) the implementation of the commitment to ‘leave no one behind’ (LNOB); and (3) support for strengthening women’s movements and cross-movement building. This assessment takes an in-depth look at how Spotlight Initiative has performed against these three themes, recognised as critical for more transformative, intersectional and sustainable approaches to ending VAWG. The thematic assessment is based on a document review and ten country case studies.

Commissioning an review of the Spotlight Initiative model: In 2021, an independent study, Imperative to Invest, was conducted to assess the impact potential of addressing VAWG through models like Spotlight Initiative. This used a mixed-method analysis to arrive at a data-driven perspective. It estimated that the Initiative’s comprehensive model is up to 90% more effective in preventing violence than other models.

Top Tips

How to select an evaluation strategy - top tips based on learning from the wider sector.

Click a tip for more information.
Consider which evaluation strategy is most appropriate for your programme
Develop clear evaluation questions
Consider different evaluation approaches and methods
Consider which evaluation method(s) are appropriate
Ensure the evaluation process adheres to high standards
View Sources