Advanced Search
- Activists
- Adolescent Girls
- Civil Society Organisations
- Community leaders
- Facilitators and mentors
- Justice Sector
- LGBTQI groups
- Local government
- Media
- Migrant workers
- National government
- Opinion leaders
- Parents
- People living with disabilities
- Police
- Private Sector
- Schools, colleges & universities
- Service providers
- Survivors
- UN agencies
- Vulnerable groups
- Women and Girls
- Women’s Rights Organisations
- Youth
The Governance structure of Spotlight Initiative and administrative responsibilities are outlined in the Fund Operations Manual Compendium and depicted below.
At the programme level, Spotlight Initiative programmes are governed by National and Regional Steering Committees. Steering Committees are context-specific and aligned with the priorities of each programme. They provide oversight and help facilitate coordination. For example, National Steering Committees engage in monitoring implementation, providing strategic advice and decision-making, and ensuring sustainability efforts are in…
A specific focus on marginalised women and girls: Spotlight Initiative’s overarching goal is to ensure that all women, especially those who are marginalised and vulnerable, live free from violence and harmful practices. This means programmes variously include a focus on women and girls with disabilities, indigenous people, migrant women and girls, ethnic minorities, those living in poverty, or any other historically marginalised group facing multiple and intersecting forms of discrimination.
Take action to implement the “leave no one behind” (LNOB) principle: Spotlight Initiative invests…
Key learning from Spotlight Initiative’s approaches to programme strategy development include:
The importance of conducting contextual research to inform the programme strategy: All Spotlight Initiative programmes were advised to conduct baseline studies to inform their monitoring framework / results reporting in the inception phase. In addition, Spotlight Initiative programmes in several countries and regions conducted additional research using various research methods to better understand the drivers of specific forms of violence, the national and specific local contexts, the existing…
At the global level
As an inter-agency initiative, anchored in the Executive Office of the Secretary-General, Spotlight Initiative leverages the collective expertise of the core UN implementing organisations – the UN Entity for Gender Equality and the Empowerment of Women (UN Women), the UN Population Fund (UNFPA), the UN Development Programme (UNDP) and the UN Children’s Fund (UNICEF). The Secretariat coordinates efforts to support teams worldwide, foster learning and share best practices. This global coordination aims to have a ripple effect, strengthening inter-agency partnerships at all…
Spotlight Initiative applies a survivor-centred approach as a guiding principle for all of its programming work across all pillars. This is an approach that:
Entails non-judgmental listening, validation and empathy;
Seeks to reduce of self-blame and shame;
Provides information about the traumatic effects of violence; and
Ensures confidentiality, safety and security, respect, non-discrimination and non-stigmatisation.
In terms of service provision, Spotlight Initiative programmes worked with service providers to consistently apply a survivor-centred and trauma-informed approach to…
Designing to context: Spotlight Initiative adapted the pillar model to the needs and challenges of each specific country and regional context. In the early stages of programme design, teams conducted country-specific assessments to understand the unique challenges and then tailored interventions under the six pillars to that context. A strong emphasis was placed on using data and research to inform the interventions and ensure that programming and budgets were allocated based on the most pressing issues related to VAWG in each context. Programmes also identified local stakeholders to partner…
VAWG programmes should monitor and respond to instances of backlash. It is essential that participants who experience backlash, especially backlash that is violent or threatening and including technology-facilitated GBV, are able to access support such as safe spaces, security, referral systems and access to the resources needed to recover. Programmes should work with implementing partners to establish clear and culturally appropriate reporting mechanisms and referral mechanisms for participants who experience backlash. See the page on how to strengthen referral mechanisms.
Programmes can be more effective and reduce the risk of backlash when they are designed to be culturally sensitive and appropriate. EVAWG efforts often involve challenging local norms, beliefs and customs; however, it is important that they do so respectfully. It is important for initiatives to be led and facilitated by local people, with a strong understanding of cultural norms and traditions. This can help address the risk of EVAWG initiatives being perceived as being imposed from outside as opposed to being community-supported and led.
VAWG programmes can improve buy-in across communities by establishing local partnerships with respected institutions and opinion leaders, who are able to help reduce the risk of backlash and resistance. For example, initiatives might partner with local faith leaders, celebrities, men and boys, as well as non-traditional actors as champions of change, to encourage support for the programme. In addition, initiatives could partner with media outlets and conduct community dialogues to share positive messages around EVAWG and reduce the potential impact of false information that may be circulated. …
EVAWG efforts can generate greater support by engaging in open dialogue to hear the concerns and perspectives of those who may disagree with the programme. Listening to these perspectives is key to understanding the challenges faced, provides an opportunity to address misconceptions about ending VAWG, and helps raise awareness about the importance of doing so. Open listenings sessions and dialogues should be facilitated at all levels, including within communities, at the State level, within institutions, and among civil society actors.
These open dialogues may be most effective if…