Advanced Search

It is important that diverse CSOs that represent and work with marginalised groups are able to access funding. Good practice in increasing accessibility of funding involves simplifying applications, monitoring and reporting processes. In addition, flexible, multi-year funds with longer timeframes enable organisations to plan long-term, build their organisational and operational capacity and scale up innovative work. This also encourages ongoing participation and trust-building with marginalised groups. In some cases, it may be appropriate to provide targeted funding opportunities for CSOs who…

Marginalised women and girls may be harder to reach due to factors such as isolation, discrimination, or limited access to resources. Local leaders often have direct knowledge of or access to these populations and may be able to facilitate outreach efforts, ensuring that services and support reach those who need them the most. Engaging local leaders in work with marginalised communities can also support ongoing advocacy and sustainability work, which can impact policy change.

However, while local leaders can act as agents of change, they can also uphold patriarchal systems and values or…

Lack of data or statistical information on the experiences, needs and priorities of marginalised groups can negatively impact their involvement or visibility in programming. To avoid this, programmers should intentionally seek and listen to people’s different perspectives, ensure specific information on marginalised groups is captured, and disaggregate data in order to make well-informed decisions. This should be reinforced in data collection throughout the project cycle, from initial research conducted, through programme design phase to the indicators selected for monitoring, evaluation and…

Interventions based on a one-size-fits-all approach can be ineffective and omit important contextual considerations and social dynamics. As a result, it is important to recognise and understand how intersecting inequalities affect diverse women and girls and shape their identity and power. This contextual understanding is vital to ensuring that VAWG response services and risk mitigation activities are inclusive and accessible to all women and girls and do not inadvertently expose survivors or individuals to further harm.

Taking an intersectional approach therefore requires critical…

Research and analysis should be undertaken with the understanding that every community includes marginalised groups, such as adolescent girls, women and girls with disabilities, women and girls with diverse sexual orientations and gender identities, and women and girls from diverse ethnic and religious affiliations. Many women and girls hold multiple intersecting identities and may have compounding experiences of marginalisation and/or discrimination.

Inclusive assessments help provide a better understanding of the dynamics of violence and exclusion, as well as the specific needs of…

Civil society organisations (CSOs) are often at the forefront of efforts to end violence against women and girls, particularly feminist and women’s rights organisations, and organisations representing marginalised groups. They do important work organising and movement building, advocating for and demanding justice, and providing direct support to survivors of violence as first responders and essential service providers, including in contexts of crisis.

CSOs representing marginalised groups typically have skills and insights that help provide specialised support and expertise to ensure that…

Any VAWG programme which involves working with women and girls, including women’s rights organisations and women human rights defenders (WHRDs), must be done in a safe and ethical manner. This is to ensure their physical, psychological and social wellbeing and lives are not put at risk in the process. Ultimately, the programmes must be accountable to women and girls. VAWG programmes often find it useful to develop a set of guiding principles that underpins the strategy. Examples of useful principles for safe, ethical VAWG programming include:

Adopt a human rights-based approach, putting the…

Once you have considered what the programme design could look like, examine the expertise and level of organisational capacity needed, as well as potential partners to implement the strategy to meet the priority needs of the community and challenges in the specific context. Consider whether a co-creation process is needed to develop the detailed programme interventions, keeping in mind the reach and intensity of activities to deliver a transformative intervention, the number of iterations, and what type of piloting/inception and adaptation phase is needed to test the intervention within the…

Not all programmes need to be designed from scratch. Some build on lessons from a pilot or initial phase, others adapt approaches that were promising in other contexts, and some scale up existing approaches proven effective in the given context. It is useful to consider which of these options might be appropriate in your context and why. 

Equally, you will need to consider what scope of programme is feasible within the timeframe and budget available. Programme managers are often faced with pressures to show quantifiable results in short timeframes. However, evidence and practice-based…

Effective VAWG programmes require a comprehensive design incorporating interventions to address key risk and protective factors in order to prevent violence, as well as work to strengthen response services for survivors of violence. In the case of the Spotlight Initiative, multiple partners worked together to develop a comprehensive approach.

However, it is also critical to understand what other organisations (e.g. bilateral donors, NGOs, women's rights organisations national and local government) are already doing or plan to do within the same geographical area and build synergies. Take…